
Legal Q&A
Q
Views3,860
About three years ago, our company registered a patent for core control technology applied to industrial automation equipment. The patent concerns a control algorithm and components that increase the operating efficiency of the equipment, and it is still applied and used in our flagship products. However, recently a competitor appears to be selling equipment that operates in a manner very similar to the core configuration of our patent. What worries me most is whether we should immediately file a patent infringement lawsuit, by what procedure it proceeds, and, if we do litigate, how much of a burden the time, cost, and proof will be.
Patent infringement lawsuit
Answer
Published:
Author : Kuk Il KIM
Hello. This is an attorney specializing in intellectual property rights at Daeryun Law LLC.
A patent infringement lawsuit is not a procedure that can be pursued based merely on the impression that something is “similar,” and it is important to systematically review the validity of the patent, the structure for determining infringement, and the proof strategy from the pre-litigation stage.
Because a patent infringement lawsuit enters a full-fledged dispute phase from the moment the complaint is filed, a legal and technical review of the following matters must precede it.
- Whether the patent held is currently validly in force
- Whether the scope of the patent claims is structured so as to encompass the allegedly infringing product
- Whether the competitor's product satisfies all of the patent's elements (element-by-element comparison)
- Whether it is a mere design-around or constitutes actual infringement
If the possibility of infringement is deemed sufficient, the patent holder files a lawsuit seeking an injunction against patent infringement and a claim for damages with the competent court.
At this point, the complaint must be drafted at a level close to a technical report, and it is very important to structure the technical logic so that the court can understand it.
Given the nature of patent cases, the court organizes the issues through claim interpretation, comparison of technical configurations, and, if necessary, technical appraisal.
In this process, technical comparison tables, product analysis materials, and expert opinions serve as key evidence.
Depending on the circumstances, the following procedures may also be pursued in parallel with the patent infringement lawsuit.
- Provisional injunction against infringement: immediate halt to the sale and manufacture of the product
- Application for preservation of evidence: securing materials to prove the infringement structure
- Response to a patent invalidation trial: defending against the other party's invalidity attack
After the judgment, there is the possibility of an appeal or a final appeal, and even upon winning the case, an execution strategy is needed to actually recover the damages.
The situation you describe appears to be a “stage where patent infringement is suspected, but a decision is needed on whether to enter litigation immediately.”
The most important thing at this stage is not an emotional response, but coolly analyzing the patent structure and the possibility of infringement and determining which strategy, among litigation, a provisional injunction, and negotiation, offers the greatest practical benefit.
Attorneys specializing in intellectual property rights at Daeryun Law LLC collaborate with patent agents to provide assistance in a direction that substantively protects the company's technological assets, from patent analysis to establishing a patent infringement lawsuit strategy, organizing technical evidence, and concluding the dispute.
If you need assistance, we recommend that you proceed with a consultation now.

Daeryun's own AI·IT-driven litigation strategy
240+ key members
1,200+ client requests per month
* 2026년 1월 변호사협회 경유증표 발급 기준
In compliance with Article 4(1) of the Korean Bar Association Advertising Rules
Every consultation is reviewed by a specialist attorney first,
so consultations are conducted by appointment.
Phone
1800-7905
Available 24/7, 365 days a year


Online Consultation
Legal services
for our clients.

Chat
Get a quick consultation via chat.
Related Members
More
Kuk Il KIM
T. 070-5117-2950
Experience as Chief Prosecutor at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office · Attorney Specializing in Criminal Law/Drugs/Intellectual Property
Key Case Results
MoreRelated Practice Areas
MoreAll fields At a glance
1/0