
Legal Q&A
Q
Views52,534
After a company dinner, I mistakenly drove under the influence and was caught in an enforcement check. I had been drinking, and because I was in a panic, fearing that the punishment would be heavier if the measurement came out high, I refused the breathalyzer test for the moment and behaved unruly. I now know it was the wrong choice, but as the police investigation approaches, I am afraid. What punishment does refusal of a breathalyzer test carry? How should I respond? I would also like to know whether refusing a breathalyzer test constitutes obstruction of official duties.
drunk driving (DUI)
refusal of a breathalyzer test
Answer
Published:
Author : DongIl PARK
Under the Road Traffic Act, if a person refuses, without justifiable reason, the police's legitimate request for a breathalyzer test, they may be subject to imprisonment for at least one year and up to five years, or a fine of at least 5 million won and up to 20 million won, and it is a matter that can result in license revocation.
Because a refusal to be tested is judged to involve an intent to conceal one's drinking state, the severity of punishment is high even for a first offense.
Even if the actual blood alcohol concentration was not measured, if the request to be tested was legitimate and the person did not comply, the mere act of avoiding it cannot escape criminal punishment.
If, in the course of refusing the test, verbal abuse of the police officer, destruction of property, or assault resulting from physical resistance was involved, the crime of obstruction of official duties may additionally be applied.
In this case, since it becomes a separate crime, punishment is imposed separately from the refusal of the breathalyzer test.
In such a situation, merely submitting a letter of apology is not sufficient, and an explanation of the circumstances at the time of the refusal is important.
It is necessary to sufficiently prepare materials that prove your will to prevent reoffending and your efforts to restore social trust, such as completion of drunk driving prevention education, a petition, and documents explaining your workplace and family circumstances.
A strategic response of subsequently submitting these to the investigative agency or the court so that they are considered as sentencing factors is important, and the level of criminal punishment and whether the case proceeds without detention may also vary depending on this process.
Therefore, it is necessary, from now on, to sincerely cooperate with the police investigation and to carefully review matters such as whether the police's breathalyzer procedure was lawful and whether your health condition or your mental and physical situation at the time affected your refusal of the breathalyzer test.
All fields At a glance
1/0

Daeryun's own AI·IT-driven litigation strategy
240+ key members
1,200+ client requests per month
* 2026년 1월 변호사협회 경유증표 발급 기준
In compliance with Article 4(1) of the Korean Bar Association Advertising Rules
Every consultation is reviewed by a specialist attorney first,
so consultations are conducted by appointment.
Phone
1800-7905
Available 24/7, 365 days a year


Online Consultation
Legal services
for our clients.

Chat
Get a quick consultation via chat.
Related Members
More
DongIl PARK
T. 070-5221-3616
Attorney Qualified as a Foreign Legal Consultant in Singapore · International Litigation/School Violence/Evidence Investigation Law Attorney

Nakhyeong Kim
T. 070-7510-2012
Judge at the Busan High Court · Daegu District Court Senior Judge (Presiding) experience

SangSu JO
T. 070-5117-3709
Experience as Deputy Chief Prosecutor at the Suncheon Branch of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office · Attorney Specializing in Sex Crimes/Drunk-driving Traffic/School Violence
Key Case Results
More