Legal Q&A
Q
Views4,306
I am currently working as a vice principal at a school. The fact that I sent an inappropriate text message to a fellow teacher while intoxicated in a private setting became an issue, and I was referred to the disciplinary committee on the ground of a violation of the duty to maintain dignity, and as a result I received a demotion. I acknowledge that the text message gave rise to grounds for discipline, but I believe the level of the discipline is excessively heavy and disproportionate even when compared with other similar cases. In such a case, I would like to know whether I can contest the demotion through a public official appeals review and how I should request the appeals review.
public official appeals review
Answer
Published:
Author : ChanWoo JEONG
Hello. This is an administrative attorney at Daeryun Law LLC.
The fact that a disciplinary disposition has been imposed on a public official, particularly a teacher, does not mean that the disposition is immediately final, and where the discipline is excessive relative to the facts, where there is a procedural defect, or where the disciplinary authority has deviated from or abused its discretionary power, it can be fully contested through the public official appeals review system.
A public official appeals review is a system in which a public official who has received an unfavorable personnel disposition, such as discipline, demotion in rank, or demotion, asserts the illegality or unfairness of that disposition and seeks relief through a procedure akin to an administrative appeal.
As a general rule, an appeals review must be requested within 30 days from the date one becomes aware that a disciplinary disposition has been imposed, and once this period has passed, an appeal can no longer be filed, so judging the timing is very important.
The appeals review documents must systematically set out the specific legal grounds and facts as to why the disposition is unlawful or unjust.
As in the matter you have raised, even though there may be room to recognize a violation of the duty to maintain dignity through a private text message sent after drinking, a demotion constitutes a very serious disciplinary measure for a teacher.
A demotion may entail serious disadvantages to one's status, including not only a drop in position but also exclusion from duties for a certain period, restrictions on remuneration, and restrictions on future promotion and assignments.
In particular, the disciplinary authority must determine a level of discipline consistent with the principle of proportionality by comprehensively considering the content, motive, circumstances, result, and degree of harm of the misconduct, as well as the party's position and work history and the likelihood of recurrence, and where the most severe level of discipline is chosen without such consideration, there is significant room to find a deviation from or abuse of discretionary power.
In this case, it appears that you could request an appeals review by legally framing the argument that the discipline is an excessive disposition that has significantly lost its validity under generally accepted social norms, focusing on such points as the fact that the conduct occurred in a private sphere with no direct relation to the performance of duties, that it is difficult to find any concrete adverse effect on the actual operation of the school or the protection of students, and that the demotion is markedly heavy compared with the level of discipline ordinarily imposed in similar cases.
A public official appeals review is an area of legal judgment concerning the extent to which the limits of disciplinary discretion are to be recognized.
Therefore, it is very important to approach the matter strategically from the stage of requesting the appeals review by comprehensively examining the scope of the recognized grounds for discipline, the appropriateness of the disciplinary determination, and the existence of any procedural defect.
If you have received a heavy disciplinary disposition such as demotion, suspension from duty, or dismissal, we recommend that you actively make use of the public official appeals review system to examine the possibility of relief.
Because the initial response can also change the direction that may later extend to administrative litigation, receiving assistance from an administrative attorney with extensive relevant experience can be of practical help.

Daeryun's own AI·IT-driven litigation strategy
240+ key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
In compliance with Article 4(1) of the Korean Bar Association Advertising Rules
Every consultation is reviewed by a specialist attorney first,
so consultations are conducted by appointment.
Phone
1800-7905
Available 24/7, 365 days a year


Online Consultation
Legal services
for our clients.

Chat
Get a quick consultation via chat.
Related Members
More
ChanWoo JEONG
T. 070-5221-2387
Extensive corporate legal litigation and advisory experience · Attorney specializing in inheritance/tax/administrative law

InWon KIM
T. 070-7510-1044
Former Chief Prosecutor [Criminal], Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office · Attorney Specializing in Criminal Law/DUI Traffic/Accounting Audit/Evidence Examination

Naewon Kwak
T. 070-5117-2950
Career as Judge, Seoul Administrative Court, Seoul Central District Court · Attorney Specializing in Family Law/Labor Law/Administrative Law

TaeSeung LEE
T. 070-7510-1118
Experience as Head of the Masan Branch of the Changwon District Prosecutors' Office · Criminal/Sexual Offense/Drug/School Violence Law Attorney
Key Case Results
MoreMitigation to Suspension From Duty by Proving the Unfairness of the Vice Principal's Demotion
Administrative Attorney Obtains Revocation of a Life Education Committee Disciplinary Disposition
Assisting a Client Dismissed Through Public Official Disciplinary Action and Achieving Mitigation of the Disposition
Related Practice Areas
MoreAll fields At a glance
1/0